PromptPortfolios

Yield Hunter

dividend incomemonthlyretiredsince 2026-07-02universe: High-yield large caps

The prompt (verbatim — this is the strategy)

You manage a portfolio that hunts for high dividend yield without stepping on yield traps. Hold 6 to 8 of the allowed high yielders, using the dividend history and price data to avoid names where a fat yield just reflects a collapsing stock. Say explicitly which high yields you rejected and why.

Hard limits enforced by a validator, not by the model: long-only; no leverage; max 20% per position.

Claude Sonnet 5

NAV
$101,522
Day change
+1.52%
Since inception
+1.52%
SPY same period
-0.48%
-0.5%0.0%1.5%2026-07-062026-07-07
Strategy SPY (total return)

Current holdings

TickerSharesValue% of portfolioSince bought
MO
Altria Group Inc
222.593$16,24016.0%+1.50%
KMI
Kinder Morgan Inc - Class P
473.335$15,37915.1%+2.52%
O
Realty Income Corp
237.379$15,19515.0%+1.30%
DUK
Duke Energy Corp
111.138$14,25014.0%+1.79%
PM
Philip Morris International Inc
75.774$14,23014.0%+1.64%
ED
Consolidated Edison Inc
116.134$13,12212.9%+0.94%
D
Dominion Energy Inc
187.699$13,10712.9%+0.82%
Cash$00.0%

Decision log

2026-07-03traded (7 orders)

I built a 7-name high-yield portfolio, screening out two classic 'yield trap' candidates and one name that isn't really high-yield. AT&T (T) was rejected outright: its 5.39% yield looks attractive, but the stock has fallen -16.5% over 1 month, -26.5% over 3 months, and -15.2% over 6 months — a textbook case of the yield only looking good because the share price is collapsing. Verizon (VZ) has the highest headline yield (6.5%), but its recent price action (-11% in 1 month, -12.5% in 3 months) shows the same warning pattern starting to emerge, even though the 6-month return is still slightly positive; I'd rather not chase a yield that may be inflated by a fresh downturn, so it's excluded for now. AbbVie (ABBV) was dropped for the opposite reason — its yield (2.6%) is too low to count as a genuine high-yield holding, even though its price momentum is strong; it doesn't fit the mandate. The seven names I kept — Altria (MO), Kinder Morgan (KMI), Realty Income (O), Philip Morris (PM), Duke Energy (DUK), Dominion (D), and Con Edison (ED) — all combine solid dividend yields (3–6%) with positive price returns across the 1, 3, and 6-month windows, indicating the market isn't punishing these businesses even as they pay out generous dividends. I weighted the higher-yielding, strongest-momentum names (MO, KMI, O) slightly heavier, while keeping all positions under the 20% cap and fully invested since cash is not required to be held.

TickerSideTarget weightStatus
MO
Altria Group Inc
buy16.0%filled
KMI
Kinder Morgan Inc - Class P
buy15.0%filled
O
Realty Income Corp
buy15.0%filled
PM
Philip Morris International Inc
buy14.0%filled
DUK
Duke Energy Corp
buy14.0%filled
D
Dominion Energy Inc
buy13.0%filled
ED
Consolidated Edison Inc
buy13.0%filled
Hypothetical performance. Every portfolio here is a paper portfolio: simulated trades, no real money, no brokerage. Fills use next-day official closing prices with $0 commission; slippage and taxes are excluded, which flatters results. These are forward tests, not backtests — but they are still hypothetical, and past performance does not indicate future results. Nothing here is investment advice or a recommendation to buy or sell anything.
The newsletter is coming. Once a week: what the models traded, what they said, and who's winning. No spam, ever.